Publish or Perish: The plague of academia

Over the last couple of weeks, there has been some discussion online about the worth of peer review.  Is it valuable, or is it antiquated?  As an Assistant Professor who goes up for tenure next fall, allow me to contribute my two cents.
I guess the real question behind this whole publish or perish (which leads [...]

More on page 135

(POI) Week one responses to me

See my previous post to see what my week one response was.
Here is what classmate N. responded:
I completely agree with you and I do not see why grading participation is so important. Obviously the ultimate goal is to teach the topics covered in a course effectively by enforcing critical thinking. As long as a student [...]

More on page 252

(POI) Week one questions

The book we are using is Teaching online: A practical guide, by Ko and Rossen.  Week one had us reading chapters one and two.  We then answered the following questions:

Question #1: How would you implement online discussions in your course?
Question #2: To help students become involved in an online course, what should be included [...]

More on page 250

Scholarly communication must transform

Musings Comments (0)

In light of my last post on Publish or Perish: The Plague of Academia, I ran across a ten part series called “Scholarly Communication Must Transform,” written by Gideon Burton, an Assistant Professor in the English department at one of my alma maters, Brigham Young University.  In this series, Gideon discusses his views on the subject.  Very interesting reads.

Here are his topics:

Enjoy!

@ February 23, 2010

POI Week 2 Responses

Best Practices, Courses, Oklahoma State University, POI Comments (0)

OK, here are the week 2 questions with my responses:

1.  How do you plan to design your online course to encourage free flow ideas and requests for clarification–discussion forums, email, chatrooms, team activities, other?

I generally make use the discussion boards for clarification.  I also generally set up a specific discussion board for clarification, and I will also set up one for general topics or off topics.  I call it the Student Union or Watercooler. I generally let the students handle the topics in there and let it be “their space.”  I use synchronous chat for office hours.  I have it open at certain times and students can come in and ask questions as needed.  I use Facebook for the same thing.

2.  What thoughts do you have about timing access to different components of the lesson(s)–one-time dump, progressive access, access tied to specific assignments, allow students to work ahead or go back to catch up, other?

I’ve done both, and it generally depends on the content.  Some content lends itself to work-at-your-own-pace, and some doesn’t.

So there you have it.  Nothing earth-shattering, but my opinions nonetheless.  I’m actually kind of bummed about how this course is going.  Not a whole lot of discussion going on, and everyone is waiting until the last minute to post and that makes it difficult for anyone to respond.

Yeah, you know what I’m talking about . . .

@ February 22, 2010